Category Archives: legal matters

Aroa Merino doing business as Solicitor agent for TLT Solicitors

Aroa Merino Solicitor, ,

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

There is a formal and civil obligation to publish this public notice.

A Common Law Commercial Lien is a process that any wo/man can employ in order to obtain lawful remedy from the action of another wo/man who have – or attempted to- or have conspired to – damage said wo/man in some way. Such wrongs are known as ‘torts’ and are the subject of Tort Law. This includes ‘harassment’ such as ‘treats with menaces’, which is considered to be ‘psychological damage’, and also ‘defamation of character’ which is also considered to ‘damage a reputation’. The reason for this is very simple: Since all are equal under the LAW, then each man or woman has a Duty of Care to each other man or woman, such as to make sure that – whatever action we take towards each other – we have the Common Law behind those actions, and thus can live together in peace. Abrogating said Duty of Care is a CRIMINAL ACT, and constitutes a tort.

This is a notice of a formal and agreed lien by way of a remedy for the criminal offences by the Tortfeasor of (1)Trespass; (2) Identity theft; (3)Harassment; (4)A claim absent a lawfully binding contract; (5)Unlawful claim of ownership of my property; (6)Using my fiction without prior written permission; (7)Unlawful threat of legal action; (8) Unlawful use of my private property; (9) Breach of privacy; as well as damage of My immeasurable energy.

i, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright] have an Affidavit of Obligation – Security by way of a lien against, and therefore an interest in, the personal estate of Aroa Merino doing business as ASSISTANT SOLICITOR agent for TLT Solicitors, C/o One, Redcliffe Street,
Bristol, [BS1 6TP]

******************************************
NOTICE

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between Myself, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright], and the individual who accepts liability for the name Aroa Merino doing business as ASSISTANT SOLICITOR, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that i have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and My remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus i am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the sum certain of Twenty Three million Six Hundred Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Pounds Sterling, (£23,615,980.00).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

Record Location: Common Law Court CL/22/838286

End of Notice

All words are to be understood in their original definition as defined in English and outside any and all Legal definitions decreed by the Law Society.

All Rights Reserved

Errors and Omissions Excepted

Daniel Schwennicke doing business as BARRISTER

Daniel Schwennicke - BARRISTER, ,

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

There is a formal and civil obligation to publish this public notice.

A Common Law Commercial Lien is a process that any wo/man can employ in order to obtain lawful remedy from the action of another wo/man who have – or attempted to- or have conspired to – damage said wo/man in some way. Such wrongs are known as ‘torts’ and are the subject of Tort Law. This includes ‘harassment’ such as ‘treats with menaces’, which is considered to be ‘psychological damage’, and also ‘defamation of character’ which is also considered to ‘damage a reputation’. The reason for this is very simple: Since all are equal under the LAW, then each man or woman has a Duty of Care to each other man or woman, such as to make sure that – whatever action we take towards each other – we have the Common Law behind those actions, and thus can live together in peace. Abrogating said Duty of Care is a CRIMINAL ACT, and constitutes a tort.

This is a notice of a formal and agreed lien by way of a remedy for the criminal offences by the Tortfeasor of: (1)Trespass; (2)Identity theft/fraud; (3)Harassment; (4) Being complicit to a claim absent a lawfully binding contract; (5)Unlawful claim of ownership of property; (6)Larceny; (7)Unlawful threat of legal action; (8) Use of My fiction/property without written permission (9) Breach of privacy; as well as damage of My immeasurable energy.

i, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright] have an Affidavit of Obligation – Security by way of a lien against, and therefore an interest in, the personal estate of Daniel Schwennicke doing business as BARRISTER, C/o Fountain Court Chambers, Middle Temple Ln, Temple, London [EC4Y 9DH]

******************************************
NOTICE

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between Myself, Jacqueline: [houseof Wright], and the individual who accepts liability for the name Daniel Schwennicke doing business as BARRISTER, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that i have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and My remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus i am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the sum certain of Twenty Three million Six Hundred Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Pounds Sterling, (£23,615,980.00).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

Record Location: Common Law Court CL/22/838281.

End of Notice

All words are to be understood in their original definition as defined in English and outside any and all Legal definitions decreed by the Law Society.

All Rights Reserved

Errors and Omissions Excepted

Ross Hirst doing business as Principal of Hirst and Co Family Lawyers, Brisbane

Ross Hirst

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Ross Hirst”, at address “Hirst and Co Family Lawyers, Level 2/247 Adelaide St, Brisbane City QLD 4000, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is $151,360,160.00. (one hundred and fifty one million three hundred and sixty thousand one hundred and sixty dollars).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
assisted civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, is an instigator in a property scam, is in breach of Queensland legislation, in breach of Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, has committed serious professional misconduct and is unfit for duty.
The Tortfeasor conspired with staff at the St. George bank, my legal team, Myles Walker, Gavin Lai, my barrister Jeffery Bunning and Judge Michael Baumann, to keep the fraudulent bank account opening documents from me. This meant that I was unaware of the extent of fraud committed against me and the respondent’s client, Peter Brooks, was not reported for his crimes.
The Tortfeasor interfered with the listing and sale of my marital home, by conspiring with Peter Brooks and Karen Murphy from Real Property Vibe, to coerce me into selling my marital home to the buyers for well below market value. The Tortfeasor was aware I was outside Australia and emailed me with instructions, threatened me with enforcing court orders and charge me costs of $5000. The respondent deceived me into believing the contract of sale was valid. My signature was not witnessed according to Queensland legislation, on the listing document or the contract of sale, therefore the documents are invalid and were not enforceable. The Tortfeasor conspired with Karen Murphy and my conveyancing solicitor, Adam Prior and kept this information from me.
The Tortfeasor, by not informing me of the civil and criminal crimes made against me, assisted with the property scam, where I was threatened with legal action and blackmailed into selling my marital home for well under the market value.

This is a criminal syndicate which includes bankers, valuers, REIQ members and judiciaries, where they use the corrupt family law courts with the corrupt family law judge, who plays a major role in gaining properties for well under market value. The predators take advantage of the collapse of the family unit, by means of threatening court action and extortionate fees if I did not agree to an unfair settlement and sale of my marital home at the price the Tortfeasor dictated.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved.

Jeffery Bunning doing business as family law barrister admits

Jeffery Bunning

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Jeffery Bunning”, at address “Level 15, Innes of Court, 107 North Quay, Brisbane City QLD 4000, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is $151,360,160.00. (one hundred and fifty one million three hundred and sixty thousand one hundred and sixty dollars).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor:
did not act ethically , has assisted civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, is an accessory after the fact, is in breach of Queensland legislation, in breach of Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, has committed serious professional misconduct and is unfit for duty.

The Tortfeasor conspired with Ross Hirst, my ex husband’s family lawyer, and my solicitor Gavin Lai into pressuring me to agree to an unfair property settlement. The Tortfeasor explained that if I didn’t agree to the offer, my case would go to court and the judge could take up to twelve months to make a decision and give the other side 75% of our property and costs against me of approximately $35k.

The Tortfeasor failed to explain to me that the General POA which my ex husband submitted to the ST George bank staff, was invalid and incomplete and to use it would be both civil and criminal fraud.

The Tortfeasor assisted in hiding the St George fraudulent bank account opening documents, which I subpoenaed. I was unaware documents were withheld from me by Myles Walker, Gavin Lai, Peter Brooks and his solicitor, Ross Hirst and Judge Baumann. This was so that Peter Brooks would not be reported for his crimes against me. This has perverted the course of justice and has assisted criminal and civil fraud.

The Tortfeasor was my family law barrister, has conspired to keep me ignorant of the crimes committed against me.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved.

Michael Baumann doing business as Family Law Court Judge in Brisbane Admits

Michael Baumann

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Michael Baumann”, at address “Harry Gibbs Commonwealth Law Courts Building, 119 North Quay, Brisbane Qld 4000, Australia”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is $373,120,160.00. (three hundred and seventy three million, one hundred and twenty thousand, one hundred and sixty dollars).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor:
did not act ethically, has assisted civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, is an accessory after the fact, is in breach of Queensland legislation, has committed serious professional misconduct and is unfit for duty.

The Tortfeasor conspired with Ross Hirst, my ex husband’s family lawyer, and my EMFL solicitor Gavin Lai and Jeffery Bunning into pressuring me to agree to an unfair settlement. The Tortfeasor was complicit with the threatening actions of Jeffery Bunning who explained that if I didn’t agree to the settlement, my case would go to court and the judge could take up to twelve months to make a decision and give the other side 75% of our property and costs against me of approximately $35k.

The Tortfeasor failed to explain to me that the General POA, was invalid and incomplete and to use it would be both civil and criminal fraud. This was used to establish fraudulent business bank accounts with the ST George bank.

The Tortfeasor did not report the criminal and civil fraud of the STG bankers and my ex-husband.
I explained to him with an affidavit and evidence, that my ex had signed on my behalf, as having POA over me to establish the fraudulent STG bank. As a judge he is duty bound to report any crimes where there is a penalty of over 5 years imprisonment.

The Tortfeasor withheld the subpoenaed St George fraudulent bank account opening documents from me and colluded with Myles Walker, Gavin Lai, Peter Brooks and his solicitor, Ross Hirst and Jeffery Bunning, to keep this information from me. This was so that Peter Brooks would not be reported for his crimes against me. This has perverted the course of justice and has assisted criminal and civil fraud.

The Tortfeasor was then complicit with the forced sale of my property which I was blackmailed, by Ross Hirst, into agreeing to sell for well under the market value. If I didn’t agree I would be taken back to court and charged fees of $5k.
The contract of sale was invalid, my signature was required to be witnessed by an Australian Lawyer or other authorised official. The Tortfeaseor was well aware I was outside Australia when this contract was forced on to me to sign.

The Tortfeasor refused to issue orders that I could collect the remainder of my personal possessions. I explained to him that my ex husband refused to give them to me and attacked me, when I went to my house following court orders. The Tortfeasor has assisted in the theft of my personal items.

The Tortfeasor was bias towards my ex husband and his family law solicitor, therefore should have stood down to allow another judge to take my case. This was because he was involved in the sale of my marital home. Due to the favouritism and deceit, the Tortfeasor’s orders were invalid and unenforceable.

The Tortfeasor is party to a property scam, where the perpertrators take advantage of family distress to force the sale of the property at a price the perpertrators, demand. Real estate agents, family lawyers, bankers, valuers were all complicit with the Tortfeasor, who is one of the worst actors I have ever seen.

All corporations have been foreclosed since 2013, therefore, this Tortfeasor has acted on his own volition and has no authority over any individual – his orders are un-enforceable.

End of Notice
All rights Reserved.

Emerson Migration Law Director Aishwarya Somal Admits

Aishwarya Somal

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Aishwarya Somal”, at address “Emerson Migration Lawyers, Level 8, Northpoint Building, 231 North Quay Brisbane Qld 4000. Australia ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$18,849,800.00 (eighteen million, eight hundred and forty nine thousand and eight hundred AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
Assisted in civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, breached the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, conspired against me, was an accessory after the fact, has committed extortion and professional misconduct.

The Tortfeasor and her collegues, Myles Walker and Gavin Lai, withheld subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank documents from me which was proof that civil and criminal fraud was committed against me. The Tortfeasor conspired with the other side and the family law judge, to keep this information from me.

The Tortfeasor refuses to put right the actions of her colleagues, even though I explained with documents to prove to her the crimes they had committed against me.

The Tortfeasor sent me an extortionate invoice for work I did not approve and then threatened me with legal action if I did not pay her. The bill is still outstanding and she has refused to give me my case file.

The Tortfeasor dishonestly intended, to make a gain and cause a loss to me by hiding the fraud committed against me. This was so that the other side could continue with the fraud of falsifying documents concerning the sale of my property.

The Tortfeasor, by hiding information, assisted with the property scam, where I was forced and blackmailed into selling my marital home for well under the market value. This is a criminal syndicate which includes judiciaries, bankers, valuers, REIQ members, where they use the corrupt family law courts with the corrupt family law judge, who plays a major role in gaining properties for much less than their worth. The perpetrators take advantage of the collapse of the family unit, by means of threatening court action and fees if I did not agree to an unfair settlement and sale of my property.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved

Gavin Lai doing business as Senior Managing Solicitor

Gavin Lai,

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Gavin Lai”, at address “Emerson Migration Lawyers, Level 8, Northpoint Building, 231 North Quay Brisbane Qld 4000. Australia ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$18,849,800.00 (eighteen million, eight hundred and forty nine thousand and eight hundred AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
Assisted in civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, breached the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, conspired against me, was an accessory after the fact and has committed professional misconduct.

The Tortfeasor and his collegues, Myles Walker and Director of EMFL, Aishwarya Somal, withheld subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank documents from me which was proof that civil and criminal fraud was committed against me, by Peter Gerard Joseph Brooks and Lesley Harding. The Tortfeasor conspired with the other side to keep this information from me and coerced me into an unfair property settlement.

The Tortfeasor refuses to put right his crimes of civil and criminal fraud, even though he conspired with the other side to keep the crimes hidden from me.

The Tortfeasor dishonestly intended, to make a gain or cause a loss to me by hiding the fraud committed against me. This was so that the other side could continue with the fraud of falsifying documents concerning the sale of my property.

The Tortfeasor, by not informing me of the civil and criminal crimes made against me, assisted with the property scam, where I was forced and blackmailed into selling my marital home for well under the market value. This is a criminal syndicate which includes bankers, valuers, REIQ members and judiciaries, where they use the corrupt family law courts with the corrupt family law judge, who plays a major role in gaining properties for well under market value. The perpetrators take advantage of the collapse of the family unit, by means of threatening court action and extortionate fees if I did not agree to an unfair settlement and sale of my marital home at the price the perpetrators dictate.

End of Notice

All Rights Reserved

Myles Walker doing business as Senior Associate Family Lawyer

Myles Walker

Myles Walker (1)

TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN

A Common Law Commercial Lien has been LAWFULLY established between myself, Jacqueline: of the family Brooks, and the individual who accepts liability for the Name “Myles Walker”, at address “Pullos Lawyers Level 3, Southport Central Building G27 Garden Street Southport Qld 4215. Australia ”, herein referred to as “the Tortfeasor”.

The reason for this Lien is that I have been the subject of a wrong (i.e. a tort) at the hands of the Tortfeasor, and my remedy IN LAW is to be able to place a Lien on their property, until the wrong has been set aright. Thus I am LAWFULLY able to seize goods and assets that belong to the Tortfeasor, up to the amount of the Commercial Lien, which is A$15,862,880.00 (fifteen million, eight hundred and sixty two thousand, eight hundred and eighty AUD).

This Notice is to inform whomsoever may be concerned that the creditworthiness of this Tortfeasor is, henceforth, highly suspect, until the Lien lapses – or is, by some other means, removed.

The Tortfeasor has:
Assisted in civil and criminal fraud, perverted the course of justice, breached the Australian Solicitors Conduct Rules, conspired against me, was negligent and has engaged in professional misconduct.

The Tortfeasor withheld subpoenaed fraudulent STG bank documents from me which was proof that civil and criminal fraud was committed against me. He conspired with the other side to keep this information from me and colluded with his colleagues at Emerson Family Law, Brisbane, to force me into an unfair property settlement.

End of Notice
All Rights Reserved

44519101 - judge gavel and scale in court. library with lot of books in background

Legal Matters Blog one

legal matters, ,

Without Prejudice

Legal- Legal Lies, October 2016 Update

This is what happened to me when I engaged solicitors Mr. Myles Walker & Mr Gavin Lai from Emerson Family Lawyers, Brisbane and Barrister Jeffery Bunning.

On separation from a 30 year marriage, my ex husband (BB) established a fraudulent business bank account with St George Bank Australia by signing as having Power of Attorney over me personally and using an unwitnessed Company Power of Attorney document. BB used our business to claim his personal expenses, submitted inaccurate end of financial year statements, allocated me wages he didn’t give me and stole thousands of dollars from our business bank account.

Because BB was reluctant to show his financial statements, I was forced to apply for subpoenas. Vital documents showing the extent of BB’s and St George Bank’s fraud were in the subpoenas.

After over a year of negotiations with my ex husband, my team of solicitors from Emerson Family Lawyers, Brisbane and Barrister Jeffery Bunning, negotiated the following for me as a divorce settlement:

to pay BB’s personal expenses from the sale of our property
to pay all BB’s business debts from the sale of the property (which I had no control of)
ignoring my personal expenses
ignoring BB’s Company fraud
ignoring BB’s theft against me
BB retains my two cars and any money he has in his pension fund (I don’t have a pension fund)
and him having 65% of the sale of our joint family property

Was this what you would call a fair settlement?

Vital documents showing the extent of BB’s and St George Bank’s fraud were deliberately withheld from me by BB, his solicitor and by my solicitors and Barrister. Was this collusion to hide BB’s and the St George Bank’s crimes?

Knowing that my solicitors had failed to produce all the evidence of BB’s fraud, I asked the owner of the firm to help, she refused, instead I was emailed a massive bill for work I had not approved.She has taken legal action against me to claim this amount.  Even when I have explained to her that her practitioners have failed in their duty and withheld vital documents and information from me which would have been beneficial with my settlement, she is still chasing me for thousands.

I am now aware that all documents when executed overseas are required to have signatures witnessed in accordance with the Government legislation. When in the UK,  I signed documents unknowing this legislation. Emerson Family Law state they deal with international law, and should be well aware of the requirements when documents are signed outside Australia.

The Legal advice I have had, is that the Company power of attorney document BB used to sell our business equipment, cars and operate our business is invalid and along with the business debts BB has incurred is criminal and civil fraud.
My solicitors and barrister should have known this and they should have told me I was not liable for his business debts. However, I was pressured into accepting them as partly my debt.

Emerson Family Lawyer’s solicitors attendance has left me without my savings and no assets, this hasn’t deterred me from exposing the truth.

BB has committed Company embezzlement, Company tax fraud, personal tax fraud, not forgetting the power of attorney fraud with the help of St George Bank a division of Westpac Group, Australia.

There are Australian Solicitors Code of Conduct rules that solicitors have to abide by, but with the range of events that have taken place with my settlement, these solicitors have ignored the rules.

Has St George Bank Australia been instrumental in this cover up of illegal conduct?

Tax fraud is tax fraud and crime is crime, however long ago it was committed- we all know this, by what has happened to others.

This statement is true to my belief and investigations and made Without Prejudice.